by Roger Dawson
In
the United States, we have a tremendous sense of fair play. Our sense
of fair play dictates to us that if both sides give equally, then that's
fair. If Fred puts his home up for sale at $200,000, Susan makes an
offer at $190,000, and both Fred and Susan are eager to compromise, both
of them tend to be thinking, "If we settled at $195,000 that would be
fair, because we both gave equally." Maybe it's fair and maybe it isn't.
It depends on the opening negotiating positions that Fred and Susan
took. If the house is really worth $190,000 and Fred was holding to his
over-inflated price only to take advantage of Susan having falling in
love with his house, then it's not fair. If the house is worth $200,000
and Susan is willing to pay that, but is taking advantage of Fred's
financial problems, then it isn't fair. So, don't fall into the trap of
thinking that splitting the difference is the fair thing to do when you
can't resolve a difference in price with the other side.
With that misconception out of the way, let me point out that Power
Negotiators know that Splitting the Difference does not mean splitting
it down the middle. Just split the difference twice and the split
becomes 75 percent/25 percent. Furthermore, you may be able to get the
other side to split the difference three or more times. I once
negotiated with a bank that had a blanket encumbrance over several
properties that I owned. I had sold one property out from under the
blanket, and our contract entitled them to a $32,000 pay-down of the
loan. I offered them $28,000. I got them to offer to split the
difference at $30,000. Over a period of weeks until this four-unit
building closed, I was able to get them to offer to split the difference
again at $29,000; and at $28,500 and finally they agreed to $28,250.
Here's how that this Gambit works:
The first thing to remember is that you should never offer to
split the difference yourself, but always encourage the other person to
offer to split the difference.
Let's say that you're a building contractor. You have been
working on getting a remodeling job that you bid at $86,000 and for
which they offered $75,000. You've been negotiating for a while, during
which time you've been able to get the owners of the property up to
$80,000, and you've come down to $84,000 with your proposal. Where do
you go from there? You have a strong feeling that if you offered to
split the difference they would agree to do so, which would mean
agreeing at $82,000.
Instead of offering to split the difference, here's what you
should do. You should say, "Well, I guess this is just not going to fly.
It seems like such a shame though. We've spent so much time on this
proposal, and we've come so close to a price with which we could both
live. It seems like a shame that it's all going to collapse, when we're
only $4,000 apart."
If you keep stressing the time that you've spent on it and the
small amount of money that you're apart on the price, eventually the
other people will say, "Look, why don't we split the difference."
You
say, "Let's see, splitting the difference, what would that mean? I'm at
$84,000 and you're at $80,000. What you're telling me is you'd come up
to $82,000? Is that what I hear you saying?"
"Well, yes," they say.
"If you'll come down to $82,000, then we'll settle for that." In doing
this you have immediately shifted the negotiating range from $80,000 to
$84,000. The negotiating range is now $82,000 - $84,000, and you have
yet to concede a dime.
So you say, "$82,000 sounds a lot better than $80,000. Tell you
what, let me talk to my partners," (or whatever other higher authority
you've set up) "and see how they feel about it. I'll tell them you came
up to $82,000, and we'll see if we can't put it together now. I'll get
back to you tomorrow."
The next day you get back to them and you
say, "Wow, are my partners tough to deal with right now. I felt sure
that I could get them to go along with $82,000, but we spent two hours
last night going over the figures again, and they insist that we'll lose
money if we go a penny below $84,000. But good golly. We're only $2,000
apart on this job now. Surely, we're not going to let it all fall apart
when we're only $2,000 apart?"
If you keep that up long enough, eventually they'll offer to split the difference again.
If
you are able to get them to split the difference again, this Gambit has
made you an extra $1,000 of bottom line profit. However, even if you
can't get them to split the difference again and you end up at the same
$82,000 that you would have done if you had offered to split the
difference, something very significant happened here. What was the
significant thing that happened?
Right.
They think they won because you got them to propose splitting the
difference at $82,000. Then you got your partners to reluctantly agree
to a proposal the other side had made. If you had suggested splitting
the difference, then you would have been putting a proposal on the table
and forcing them to agree to a proposal that you had made. That may
seem like a very subtle thing to you, but it's very significant in terms
of who felt they won and who felt they lost. Remember, the essence of
Power Negotiating is to always leave the other side thinking that he or
she won. So the rule is never offer to Split the Difference, but always
encourage the other person to offer to Split the Difference.
Key points to remember:
1. Don't fall into the trap of thinking that splitting the difference is the fair thing to do.
2. Splitting the difference doesn't mean down the middle because you can do it more than once.
3. Never offer to split the difference yourself; instead encourage the other person to offer to split the difference.
4. By getting them to offer to split the difference, you put them in a
position of suggesting the compromise. Then you can reluctantly agree
to their proposal, making them feel that they won.
Roger Dawson
is a professional speaker and the author of two of best selling books on
negotiating: Secrets of Power Negotiating and Secrets of Power
Negotiating for Salespeople, both published by Career Press. He was
inducted into the Speaker Hall of Fame in 1991.
Source:madeforsuccess.com
No comments:
Post a Comment