Thursday, 25 October 2012

The Emerging Role Of Board Remuneration Committees


Tuesday 22 January, 2002
Recent business failures have focused the spotlight on Board remuneration committees. At least some of this focus was generated when it became public knowledge that executives of failed companies such as HIH, One.Tel and Ansett enjoyed healthy remuneration packages (and in some cases, performance based incentives) in the period prior to the collapse.
Board Remuneration Committee’s accountabilities are clear:
  • To set Fixed Annual Remuneration levels for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives in the organisation.
  • To ensure that executive remuneration levels are competitive bearing in mind relative job size, market sector, company performance and capacity to pay.
  • To overview the structure of short and long term executive incentive plans.
  • To agree executive performance targets (as they relate to incentive plans) and ensure that shareholders receive fair performance return for expenditure (current or future) on incentive based remuneration.
  • To overview remuneration practice across the organisation and ensure appropriate controls and systems are in place.
When determining Fixed Annual Remuneration for executives, Board Remuneration Committees need to seek expert advice. Executive roles need to be evaluated on an annual basis and appropriate market data sourced. Paying at the upper quartile should be restricted to top performing executives in top performing organisations.

Performance measures driving short and long term incentive plans must incorporate a range of factors. They should not be limited to financial and stock market measures. They should include those measures which support the long term viability of the organisation such as environmental performance, operational performance, market share, effective research and development, investment in new ventures. Effective performance against some of these measures may not be immediately reflected in short term financial results or returns to shareholders.

The question of executive share and option plans continues to be a vexed one. We have all heard the arguments about alignment of shareholder and executive interests. However, organisational performance is complex and multi-faceted. For investors growth in share price and returns are all important. Not all shareholder take a long term perspective.

The notion of securing executive commitment through schemes which seek to generate wealth in the medium term glosses over a complex range of organisation dynamics. True commitment extends beyond financial incentives and can only be sustained where productive relationships, achievable goals, potential for growth and recognition are features of the executive environment.

In this context the Remuneration Committee (and Board) has a more subtle role - monitoring the internal climate of the organisation and assisting the CEO create a culture which will support the achievement of short and long term goals. 
 
Source:ceoonline.com

No comments:

Post a Comment