Thursday 18 October, 2007
The results a company gains from developing a high potential
employee, far outweigh the risk and cost of continuously hiring
individuals from the outside. These types of programs require time,
commitment, and money to be effective. But, companies will enjoy the
returns from their investment for years to come.
Building a high-performing team is an aspiration of most managers, but
all too often, achieving that goal requires them to primarily focus on
the employees who are low and average performers. This can drain
managers of the time and energy that could otherwise be spent inspiring
those employees who are already driving long-term, sustainable results
for the team.
So, who are these people that can dramatically affect a company's bottom line? Known as "high potentials" (HIPOs), these individuals are an organisation's future leaders because they have the "total package".
Defining high potentials (HIPOs)
- They are highly knowledgeable in their field and open to taking on new tasks;
- Willing to take risks to accomplish business goals;
- Demonstrate vision and work for results;
- Foster teamwork and build strong relationships, with their peers and subordinates, as well as managers.
While many HIPOs indeed do well without much guidance, consider what would happen if companies switched their focus from addressing the needs of the masses, to actively developing the top 10 to 20 percent of their workforce? Would such attention push top performers to be even more successful? Would it boost the performance of employees who are either meeting expectations or falling short?
Before these questions can be answered, we first need to answer the question: "Should you - or shouldn't you - tell employees they have been identified as HIPOs?"
Tell them they are a high potential employee
Answers to the "should you - or shouldn't you" question are decidedly mixed.
A benchmarking study by the Center for Organisational Research revealed that 54 percent of participating companies do not tell employees they have been labeled as high-potentials, while 46 percent do.¹ Reasons for not telling often include:
- setting expectations you cannot keep,
- using a high-potential status as a bargaining chip, or
- "kicking back" on the current job (now that a promotion is in sight).
Identifying employees as HIPOs can open the door to frank, productive discussions about the areas where they need to grow. Such feedback can now be given in a more concrete context for assessment and development, which will likely foster their development.
Naming high potentials, and making the criteria for selection public, also gives other employees a tangible goal to achieve HIPO status. It also empowers employees to take charge of their own development and careers.
Creating programs that make the best even better
Since training within an organisation is generally directed at helping the average performer improve, creating development programs specifically directed at high potentials is a paradigm shift in thinking.
As with other training and development programs, tying the objectives of a HIPO program to the company's business strategy is key. To ensure alignment, it is critical to set a proper foundation for the program by identifying selection criteria for HIPOs, developing a communication strategy and creating a process to evaluate effectiveness and facilitate continuous improvement.
Once the foundation is in place, focus on how to make the HIPO program an effective means of attracting, retaining, and motivating top employees. A successful program typically integrates:
- A development strategy (that builds core competencies), and
- An organisational strategy (that enables high performers to do their best work).
- Mentoring and/or coaching that allows HIPOs to learn from select employees or experts
- Lateral assignments/projects that transfer learning in the workplace
- Stretch/overseas assignments that challenge and provide a catalyst for growth
- Formal training through external or internal programs
- Performance-based compensation - Organisations
that base their compensation on seniority versus performance will find
it increasingly difficult to keep top talent, particularly young talent.
A variable compensation plan that differentiates pay based upon
performance will promote excellence, while rigid plans tend to lead to
an "average" workforce.
- A flexible culture - Flexible schedules and the
opportunity to telecommute are just a few ways companies can give
hardworking employees added freedom to perform their jobs.
- Re-training or terminating employees whose performance does not meet performance standards - Tolerating sub-standard performance can negatively impact the retention of high performing employees.
- Opportunities for "ownership" - Allowing HIPOs to
have full responsibility for an area of the business - small or large -
is key to personal development and builds strong ties to the company.
As with any new or re-vamped program, there is always the risk that a HIPO program will fail, or at least not generate a high return on investment. While many factors can affect the overall success of a HIPO program, one, in particular, seems to rise to the top of the list time and time again: execution. Some of the main reasons why programs fail include:
- Companies confuse high performance with high potential - A
person can be a high performer and not be a HIPO. Understanding this
balance is critical. "Performance" measures how an employee is achieving
results in their current position. "Potential" measures the capability
of an employee to perform at a higher level within the organisation.
Many times companies assume the best performers make the best leaders,
but this is not always the case.
- The program is perceived as a secret society for management's "friends"
- The criteria and objectives of the high potential program must be
well defined and communicated openly to gain employee buy-in.
- Human Resources becomes the designated champion - The champion for the program should be the CEO or a visible business leader.
- The lack of results - If the HIPO pool is not used
to fill leadership positions within the organisation, then the program
is not satisfying the company's needs and confidence will be lost.
Source:ceoonline.com
No comments:
Post a Comment